Forecasting-model selection remains difficult in heterogeneous demand because the most suitable decision rule may vary with demand structure, data availability, and forecasting horizon.
This study examines whether the selector itself should be treated as a context-dependent component of the forecasting process.
Comparison of Selection Mechanisms
Five selection mechanisms - RMSSE, ERA, OWA, CCG-AHSC, and CCG-AHSCD - are compared across 24 optimized forecasting models, nine datasets, three training-testing partitions, and horizons from 1 to 12 cycles.
Selector Performance Evaluation
Selector performance is evaluated ex post using Global Relative Accuracy (GRA), statistical tests, and a best-attainable-model reference.
No selector dominates across all conditions.
CCG-AHSC and CCG-AHSCD are more competitive for Smooth demand and several Erratic configurations, whereas OWA and ERA perform better in Intermittent and Lumpy settings.
Context-Dependent Approach
Selector suitability also changes with historical data availability and horizon, supporting a context-dependent rather than universal approach to forecasting-model selection.